Hungary has established itself as a strategic location for multinational technology companies operating in Central and Eastern Europe. Beyond its competitive corporate income tax rate and strong technical workforce, the country offers a legal and tax framework that can support innovation-driven business models — provided those frameworks are used correctly.
For many international tech groups, two topics are particularly relevant: R&D tax credits and IP structuring in Hungary.
While both areas offer meaningful opportunities, they are also subject to scrutiny by tax authorities. The key challenge is not simply identifying available incentives but ensuring that legal structures, operational reality, and tax positions are fully aligned.
This article explores how multinational tech companies can approach these issues in a compliant, defensible, and forward-looking way.
R&D tax credits in Hungary: legal foundations and practical expectations
R&D tax credits in Hungary are embedded in the country’s corporate tax system and are designed to encourage genuine research and development activity. Hungarian law broadly follows internationally accepted R&D definitions, recognizing basic research, applied research, and experimental development as potentially eligible activities.
In practice, companies conducting qualifying R&D in Hungary may benefit from:
- Corporate tax base reductions linked to direct R&D costs
- Local business tax allowances under certain conditions
- Specific payroll-related tax benefits for R&D staff
However, access to these benefits is not automatic. Hungarian tax authorities assess R&D claims with a strong focus on substance over form. It is not enough to label an activity as “R&D”. Companies must be able to demonstrate systematic experimentation and documented innovation objectives.
From a legal standpoint, this places significant importance on:
- Clear project documentation and technical descriptions
- Well-defined employee roles and responsibilities
- Internal processes showing how R&D decisions are made
In audits, authorities often review not only financial records but also development methodologies, internal communications, and decision-making chains. For multinational tech companies, this means R&D tax planning must be coordinated across legal, tax, and operational teams from the outset.
IP structuring in Hungary: ownership models and economic substance
IP structuring in Hungary determines where intellectual property is legally owned, economically exploited, and taxed. For technology companies, this includes software, algorithms, databases, patents, and proprietary know-how, which are often the most valuable assets in the group.
Hungarian law allows flexibility in how IP is held and licensed, but tax outcomes depend heavily on who performs development activities and who controls them.
Common IP models include:
- Hungarian entities acting as IP owners
- Hungarian subsidiaries operating as contract R&D providers
- Hybrid models involving shared development responsibilities
Each structure carries different legal and transfer pricing implications. If a Hungarian company is deeply involved in development but does not own the resulting IP, tax authorities may question whether the company is being adequately compensated for its contribution.
Crucially, IP structuring decisions must be supported by:
- Intragroup development and licensing agreements
- Transfer pricing documentation aligned with OECD principles
- Evidence of decision-making authority and risk assumption
A purely formal IP structure that does not reflect operational reality is unlikely to withstand audit scrutiny in Hungary.
The intersection of R&D tax credits and IP structuring in Hungary
Some of the most sensitive issues arise where R&D tax credits intersect with IP structuring in Hungary. Authorities increasingly assess these areas together rather than in isolation, particularly in the context of multinational groups.
A typical risk scenario involves:
- R&D activities that are physically carried out in Hungary
- IP ownership allocated to a foreign group company
- Hungarian entities claiming R&D-related tax benefits
In such cases, tax authorities may challenge the Hungarian entity’s entitlement to tax incentives if it does not participate in the long-term economic benefits of the IP it helps to develop. The legal analysis often focuses on functional profiles, contractual rights, and actual control over development outcomes.
International law firms in Hungary, such as the highly-rated Jalsovszky, make use of their cross-disciplinary know-how to assist their clients in matters like this.
From a compliance perspective, the objective is to ensure that R&D incentives, IP ownership, and transfer pricing policies form a coherent and defensible whole, rather than a collection of disconnected tax positions.
Documentation, audits, and dispute risks in Hungary
Hungary is recognised for its thorough and technically focused tax audits, particularly in areas related to R&D and intellectual property. Companies should expect authorities to request extensive documentation, including:
- R&D project descriptions and timelines
- Technical justifications for innovation claims
- Employment contracts and incentive structures
- Intragroup agreements governing IP and development
- Transfer pricing studies and financial models
In more complex cases, disagreements may escalate into administrative proceedings or tax litigation. At this stage, legal interpretation becomes just as important as accounting or technical arguments. The ability to demonstrate consistency across legal contracts, tax filings, and actual business operations often determines the outcome of disputes.
For multinational tech companies, audit readiness is therefore not a defensive afterthought but a core element of risk management.
Strategic planning considerations for multinational tech groups
The real value of R&D tax credits and effective IP structuring in Hungary emerges when they are embedded into long-term business strategy rather than treated as isolated tax optimizations.
Well-structured approaches typically include:
- Early involvement of legal and tax professionals during R&D planning
- Periodic review of IP structures as products and markets evolve
- Alignment between global IP strategy and local operational realities
- Ongoing monitoring of regulatory and enforcement trends
In summary, Hungary offers meaningful opportunities for innovation-focused companies, but the system rewards those who plan carefully, document thoroughly, and adapt proactively to change.
Our dedicated team gathers information from all the reliable sources to make the law accessible and understandable for everyone. We provide the latest legal news stories from across the country, delivered straight to you.
Satyakam